home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
CNN Newsroom: Global View
/
CNN Newsroom: Global View.iso
/
txt
/
hrw
/
hrwhel92.004
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-05-02
|
16KB
|
314 lines
<text>
<title>
Estonia, Latvia And Lithuania
</title>
<article>
<hdr>
Human Rights Watch World Report 1992
Helsinki Watch: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
</hdr>
<body>
<p>(This chapter addresses human rights developments in the Baltic
states following international and Soviet acceptance of their
independence in late August and early September 1991. Events in
these states earlier in the year are treated as part of the
separate chapter on the Soviet Union.)
</p>
<p>Human Rights Developments
</p>
<p> After more than fifty years of rule by the Soviet
government, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania gained international
recognition as independent, sovereign states in late August
1991. (On August 22, Iceland became the first country to
recognize the independence of the Baltic states. Denmark
followed on August 24; Argentina and Norway on August 25;
Canada, Malta and Czechoslovakia on August 26; and the European
Community, on August 27. The United States granted recognition
on September 2, the thirty-second country to do so.) The Kremlin
followed suit on September 6. All three new nations were
admitted to the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe
(CSCE) and participated in the Moscow CSCE conference in
September. In October, they were admitted to the United Nations,
and later that month they became associate members of NATO.
</p>
<p> The Baltic states quickly made their presence felt on the
international human rights scene. For example, Lithuania
expressed its interest in ratifying the U.N. Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights. Estonia acceded in December to the
optional protocol of that covenant, thereby allowing reporting
of individual violations to the U.N. Human Rights Committee. In
May 1990, before international recognition of its independent
status, the Latvian government acceded to some 50 international
treaties, including those on human rights.
</p>
<p> An important human rights issue in all three Baltic states
is the status of national minorities who were Soviet citizens
when the Soviet Union was a single political entity. Many of
these minorities may have to fulfill new naturalization
requirements to become citizens of the states in which they
reside. Proposed new citizenship laws became the focus of
intense debate. These questions reached a head in fall of 1991
when all three Baltic states issued new laws or official
guidelines on citizenship.
</p>
<p> The laws and principles on citizenship in the three Baltic
states share certain features. They grant citizenship
automatically to those who were citizens or residents of their
respective states at the time of Soviet occupation--1940--and to their direct descendants. These laws and principles also
establish certain residency and language requirements for
naturalization, define criteria for ineligibility, and--with
the exception of Latvia which changed its law on November 27
forbid dual citizenship. The ban on dual citizenship has met a
hostile reception from emigres who would like to return or take
up citizenship in one of the Baltic states but do not want to
give up their adopted citizenship in other countries.
</p>
<p> Lithuania was the first to produce a law on citizenship,
promulgating it in November 1989. (Subsequently, Lithuania
issued a new citizenship law on December 10, 1991; at this
writing Helsinki Watch has only obtained oral translations of
some portions of its text by the Lithuanian Embassy.) The 1989
law automatically extends citizenship to those who can prove
they were permanent residents, and were legally employed, in
Lithuania for at least ten years before the law entered into
force. Those who could meet this requirement, were given two
years--until November 1991--to opt for Lithuanian
citizenship. The new law ends this "grace period" for selecting
citizenship for those who do not meet the ten-year
residency/employment requirement.
</p>
<p> Other naturalization conditions state that individuals may
be naturalized in the future if they have been permanent
residents in Lithuania for ten years with legal employment or
a source of legal support, know the Lithuanian language, and
know the basic provisions of the Lithuanian Constitution. (The
law thus distinguishes between two groups of people: those who
had settled in Lithuania ten years before it became a sovereign
state, and those who migrated to Lithuania more recently or
after the law's adoption. (The preliminary information that
Helsinki Watch has obtained on the 1991 Lithuanian citizenship
law did not shed light on the key issue of the rights of
permanent resident aliens.)
</p>
<p> Two provisions in the Lithuanian law violate international
human rights standards. Under its provisions on naturalization,
citizenship would be denied to recent migrants who, among other
things, have been sentenced to imprisonment for "a serious,
deliberate crime" or who are alcoholics and drug addicts.
Denying citizenship to persons whose criminal conviction took
place before the law's adoption adds an additional, ex post
facto penalty to their punishment, a condition forbidden by
international standards set forth in Article 15 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Excluding
from naturalization permanent residents who are alcoholics and
drug addicts is particularly pernicious because it would likely
discourage them from seeking needed treatment. (These
conditions still seem to stand in the 1991 Lithuanian
citizenship law.)
</p>
<p> On October 15, the Latvian Supreme Council (parliament)
issued a conceptual framework to guide future legislation on
citizenship in Latvia. This legal framework has been attacked
by Latvian emigres, who eventually managed to reverse its
initial ban on dual citizenship; by the Latvian radical right,
who claim that the present Supreme Council lacks the needed
legal authority to issue it; and by groups representing various
segments of the non-Latvian half of the population. It is
likely that these questions will be the subject of many more
debates before the new Latvian citizenship law achieves its
final shape.
</p>
<p> The framework first affirms the validity of the 1919 Latvian
citizenship law, in effect in pre-Soviet Latvia. The framework
also states that many Soviet citizens settled in Latvia as a
result of the long and illegal Soviet annexation of the
republic. It points out that one purpose of this law is to
"liquidate the consequences of the Soviet Union's occupation and
annexation of Latvia" and renew the legal rights of citizens of
the Republic of Latvia. Therefore, it revokes the 1940 Soviet
law on citizenship for Latvia.
</p>
<p> The Latvian government's desire to try to put right the
wrongs of Soviet rule are understandable. Even so, some of the
categories of those ruled ineligible for Latvian citizenship
are overly broad: those convicted for attempting to undermine
or overthrow by unconstitutional methods the independent and
democratic Latvian republic, its parliamentary system or its
government; those serving in the ranks of the Soviet military,
MVD or KGB forces and those who settled in Latvia after 1940
upon retirement from these forces; common criminals and those
convicted of crimes against humanity; those convicted of
disseminating chauvinist, fascist, communist or totalitarian
ideologies; those sent to Latvia after June 17, 1940, as
Communist Party and Komsomol officials; and registered
alcoholics, addicts and those without a legal source of income.
</p>
<p> The legal framework states that those who were citizens or
legal residents of Latvia before 1940 and their descendants
must register for a Latvian passport by July 1, 1992. In
general, anyone living in Latvia and wanting to become a citizen
can expect to be naturalized if he or she submits an application
by July 1, 1992. Such applicants must show: knowledge of spoken
Latvian; proof that he or she is no longer a citizen of another
country; proof of a minimum of sixteen years' residency in
Latvia; acquaintance with the Latvian Constitution; and